Rankers, Rankees, & Rankings: Peeking into the Pandora's Box from a Socio-Technical Perspective
Jun Yuan, Julia Stoyanovich, Aritra Dasgupta

TL;DR
This paper highlights the profound societal impacts of algorithmic rankings and advocates for interdisciplinary research to develop principled methods for studying their socio-technical effects and accountability.
Contribution
It calls for a human-centered data science approach to understand and measure the socio-technical impacts of ranking algorithms across stakeholders.
Findings
Rankings significantly influence societal and individual outcomes.
Small algorithmic changes can lead to major consequences.
Interdisciplinary collaboration is essential for responsible ranking systems.
Abstract
Algorithmic rankers have a profound impact on our increasingly data-driven society. From leisurely activities like the movies that we watch, the restaurants that we patronize; to highly consequential decisions, like making educational and occupational choices or getting hired by companies -- these are all driven by sophisticated yet mostly inaccessible rankers. A small change to how these algorithms process the rankees (i.e., the data items that are ranked) can have profound consequences. For example, a change in rankings can lead to deterioration of the prestige of a university or have drastic consequences on a job candidate who missed out being in the list of the preferred top-k for an organization. This paper is a call to action to the human-centered data science research community to develop principled methods, measures, and metrics for studying the interactions among the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI
