Isoscaling in central Sn+Sn collisions at 270 MeV/u
J.W. Lee (1), M.B. Tsang (2, 3), C.Y. Tsang (2, 3), R. Wang (2),, J. Barney (2, 3), J. Estee (2, 3), T. Isobe (4), M. Kaneko (4, 5),, M. Kurata-Nishimura (4), W.G. Lynch (2, 3), T. Murakami (e6, 4, 5),, A. Ono (6), S.R. Souza (7, 8), D.S. Ahn (4), L. Atar (9, 10), T. Aumann, (9

TL;DR
This study investigates isoscaling behavior in Sn+Sn heavy-ion collisions at 270 MeV/u, revealing that thermal equilibrium assumptions fail for high-momentum particles, challenging existing models.
Contribution
It provides new experimental data and analysis showing the breakdown of isoscaling at high transverse momentum, highlighting limits of current statistical and molecular dynamics models.
Findings
Isoscaling holds for low-energy particles in both models.
Breakdown of isoscaling observed at high transverse momentum.
Antisymmetrized molecular dynamics model cannot explain high-momentum behavior.
Abstract
Experimental information on fragment emissions is important in understanding the dynamics of nuclear collisions and in the development of transport model simulating heavy-ion collisions. The composition of complex fragments emitted in the heavy-ion collisions can be explained by statistical models, which assume that thermal equilibrium is achieved at collision energies below 100 MeV/u. Our new experimental data together with theoretical analyses for light particles from Sn+Sn collisions at 270 MeV/u, suggest that the hypothesis of thermal equilibrium breaks down for particles emitted with high transfer momentum. To inspect the system's properties in such limit, the scaling features of the yield ratios of particles from two systems, a neutron-rich system of and a nearly symmetric system of , are examined…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
