A Mixed Model Approach for Estimating Regional Functional Connectivity from Voxel-level BOLD Signals

TL;DR

This paper introduces a mixed-effects modeling approach to improve the estimation of regional brain connectivity from voxel-level fMRI data, addressing biases in traditional correlation measures.

Contribution

The paper develops a novel mixed-effects model and computational pipeline for more accurate, subject-specific inter-regional connectivity estimation from high-dimensional voxel data.

Findings

Simulation confirms reliability and accuracy of estimates.

Method outperforms traditional correlation in test-retest reliability.

Application to real data demonstrates improved connectivity assessment.

Abstract

Resting-state brain functional connectivity quantifies the synchrony between activity patterns of different brain regions. In functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), each region comprises a set of spatially contiguous voxels at which blood-oxygen-level-dependent signals are acquired. The ubiquitous Correlation of Averages (CA) estimator, and other similar metrics, are computed from spatially aggregated signals within each region, and remain the quantifications of inter-regional connectivity most used by neuroscientists despite their bias that stems from intra-regional correlation and measurement error. We leverage the framework of linear mixed-effects models to isolate different sources of variability in the voxel-level signals, including both inter-regional and intra-regional correlation and measurement error. A novel computational pipeline, focused on subject-level inter-regional correlation parameters of interest, is developed to address the challenges of applying maximum (or restricted maximum) likelihood estimation to such structured, high-dimensional spatiotemporal data. Simulation results demonstrate the reliability of correlation estimates and their large sample standard error approximations, and their superiority relative to CA. The proposed method is applied to two public fMRI data sets. First, we analyze scans of a dead rat to assess false positive performance when connectivity is absent. Second, individual human brain networks are constructed for subjects from a Human Connectome Project test-retest database. Concordance between inter-regional correlation estimates for test-retest scans of the same subject are shown to be higher for the proposed method relative to CA.