A Retrospective Study on the Investigation of Potential Clinical Benefits of Online Adaptive Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer

TL;DR

This retrospective study evaluates the potential clinical benefits of online adaptive proton therapy for head and neck cancer, showing improved target coverage and organ sparing compared to offline methods, suggesting its promising role in personalized radiotherapy.

Contribution

The study provides the first comparative analysis of online versus offline adaptive proton therapy effects on treatment outcomes using patient-specific simulations.

Findings

Online adaptive proton therapy improved target coverage in some patients.

It reduced doses to critical organs like parotid and oral cavity.

Potential to enhance treatment efficacy while sparing normal tissues.

Abstract

Online adaptive proton therapy (APT) is an ideal solution theoretically, which however is challenging to proton clinics. Although multiple groups have been endeavoring to develop online APT technology, there is a concern in the radiotherapy community about the necessity of online APT because of its unknown impact on treatment outcomes. Hence, we have performed a retrospective study to investigate the potential clinical effects of online APT for HN cancer patients in relative to the current offline APT via simulations. To mimic an online APT treatment course, we have recalculated and evaluated the actual dose of the current treatment plan on patient actual treatment anatomy captured by cone beam CT for each fraction. The cumulative dose of simulated online APT courses was compared to actual offline APT courses and the initially designed treatment plan dose. For patients 1 and 2, the simulated online ART course maintained a relatively higher CTV dose coverages than the offline ART course, particularly for CTV-Low, which led to an improvement of 2.66% and 4.52% in TCP of CTV-Low. For patients 3 and 4, with clinically comparable CTV dose coverages, the simulated online ART course achieved better OAR sparing than the offline ART course. The mean doses of right parotid and oral cavity were decreased from 29.52 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and 41.89 Gy RBE to 22.16 Gy RBE and 34.61 Gy RBE for patient 3, leading to a reduce of 1.67% and 3.40% in NTCP for the two organs. Compared to the current clinical practice, the retrospective study indicated that online APT tended to spare more normal tissues by achieving the clinical goal with merely half of the positional uncertainty margin. Future studies are needed to help identify the patients with large potential benefits prior to treatment to conserve scarce clinical resources.