A Comparative Study of Smartphone and Smart TV Apps

TL;DR

This study compares smartphone and smart TV apps to understand their relationship, similarities, differences, and security issues, providing insights valuable for developers and researchers in the evolving TV app ecosystem.

Contribution

It is the first large-scale comparative analysis of smartphone and smart TV apps, revealing patterns of code reuse, security vulnerabilities, and user interaction differences.

Findings

43% of resource files are reused between app pairs

50% of code methods are reused between app pairs

TV apps have fewer user interactions but similar interaction types

Abstract

Context: Smart TVs have become one of the most popular television types. Many app developers and service providers have designed TV versions for their smartphone applications. Despite the extensive studies on mobile app analysis, its TV equivalents receive far too little attention. The relationship between phone and TV has not been the subject of research works. Objective: In this paper, we aim to characterize the relationship between smartphone and smart TV apps. To fill this gap, we conduct a comparative study on smartphone and smart TV apps in this work, which is the starting and fundamental step to uncover the domain-specific challenges. Method: We gather a large-scale phone/TV app pairs from Google Play Store. We then analyzed the app pairs quantitatively and qualitatively from a variety of perspectives, including non-code (e.g., metadata, resources, permissions, etc.), code (e.g., components, methods, user interactions, etc.), security and privacy (e.g., reports of AndroBugs and FlowDroid). Results: Our experimental results indicate that (1) the code of the smartphone and TV apps can be released in the same app package or in separate app packages with the same package name; (2) 43% of resource files and 50% of code methods are reused between phone/TV app pairs; (3) TV and phone versions of the same app often encounter different kinds of security vulnerabilities; and (4) TV apps encounter fewer user interactions than their phone versions, but the type of user interaction events, surprisingly, are similar between phone/TV apps. Conclution: Our findings are valuable for developers and academics in comprehending the TV app ecosystem by providing additional insight into the migration of phone apps to TVs and the design mechanism of analysis tools for TV apps.