Improving social welfare in non-cooperative games with different types of quantum resources

TL;DR

This paper explores how different quantum resources, including entangled states and classical advice from quantum devices, can create new equilibria and enhance social welfare in multipartite non-cooperative games.

Contribution

It introduces a second quantum setting with classical advice, compares it to direct entanglement, and uses SDP techniques to analyze social welfare improvements.

Findings

Quantum resources can lead to new Nash equilibria.

The set of equilibrium correlations with classical advice is a subset of that with direct entanglement.

Quantum resources can improve social welfare bounds in non-cooperative games.

Abstract

We investigate what quantum advantages can be obtained in multipartite non-cooperative games by studying how different types of quantum resources can lead to new Nash equilibria and improve social welfare -- a measure of the quality of an equilibrium. Two different quantum settings are analysed: a first, in which players are given direct access to an entangled quantum state, and a second, which we introduce here, in which they are only given classical advice obtained from quantum devices. For a given game $G$, these two settings give rise to different equilibria characterised by the sets of equilibrium correlations $Q_\textrm{corr}(G)$ and $Q(G)$, respectively. We show that $Q(G)\subseteq Q_\textrm{corr}(G)$, and by exploiting the self-testing property of some correlations, that the inclusion is strict for some games $G$. We make use of SDP optimisation techniques to study how these quantum resources can improve social welfare, obtaining upper and lower bounds on the social welfare reachable in each setting. We investigate, for several games involving conflicting interests, how the social welfare depends on the bias of the game and improve upon a separation that was previously obtained using pseudo-telepathic solutions.