Medical Bill Shock and Imperfect Moral Hazard
Alex Hoagland, David M. Anderson, Ed Zhu

TL;DR
This paper investigates how delays in medical billing information influence household spending behavior, revealing that bill arrival significantly alters subsequent healthcare spending and that correcting misperceptions can reduce costs.
Contribution
It introduces a model of healthcare demand accounting for delayed pricing information and quantifies the impact of correcting misperceptions on reducing healthcare expenditure.
Findings
Households increase spending by 22% after scheduled care.
Spending decreases by 11% after bills arrive.
Correcting misperceptions reduces median spending by 7% annually.
Abstract
Consumers are sensitive to medical prices when consuming care, but delays in price information may distort moral hazard. We study how medical bills affect household spillover spending following utilization, leveraging variation in insurer claim processing times. Households increase spending by 22\% after a scheduled service, but then reduce spending by 11\% after the bill arrives. Observed bill effects are consistent with resolving price uncertainty; bill effects are strongest when pricing information is particularly salient. A model of demand for healthcare with delayed pricing information suggests households misperceive pricing signals prior to bills, and that correcting these perceptions reduce average (median) spending by 16\% (7\%) annually.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealthcare Policy and Management · Global Health Care Issues · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Methodstravel james
