On the Interaction Between Differential Privacy and Gradient Compression in Deep Learning
Jimmy Lin

TL;DR
This paper empirically investigates how differential privacy and gradient compression interact in deep learning, revealing that compression can sometimes mitigate privacy-induced accuracy loss and proposing methods to improve test accuracy.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed empirical analysis of the combined effects of differential privacy and gradient compression on deep learning accuracy, with practical recommendations.
Findings
Gradient compression can reduce accuracy loss in private training.
Aggressive sparsification lessens the impact of added Gaussian noise.
Proposed methods improve test accuracy by up to 24.6%.
Abstract
While differential privacy and gradient compression are separately well-researched topics in machine learning, the study of interaction between these two topics is still relatively new. We perform a detailed empirical study on how the Gaussian mechanism for differential privacy and gradient compression jointly impact test accuracy in deep learning. The existing literature in gradient compression mostly evaluates compression in the absence of differential privacy guarantees, and demonstrate that sufficiently high compression rates reduce accuracy. Similarly, existing literature in differential privacy evaluates privacy mechanisms in the absence of compression, and demonstrates that sufficiently strong privacy guarantees reduce accuracy. In this work, we observe while gradient compression generally has a negative impact on test accuracy in non-private training, it can sometimes improve…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
MethodsTest · Gradient Sparsification
