Investigating the Hubble Tension: Effect of Cepheid Calibration
Rahul Kumar Thakur, Harish Kumar, Shashikant Gupta, Dinkar Verma,, Rahul Nigam

TL;DR
This study investigates whether calibration issues with Cepheid variables contribute to the Hubble tension, finding host-dependent effects and systematic biases that suggest the tension may not be entirely due to measurement errors.
Contribution
The paper applies statistical tests to analyze Cepheid calibration data, revealing host-dependent biases and systematic effects impacting Hubble constant estimates.
Findings
Cepheid calibration shows non-Gaussian systematic effects.
H0 values differ significantly across host environments.
Neglecting metal-rich Milky Way sample does not resolve Hubble tension.
Abstract
Recent observations of Type Ia supernovae (SNe) by SH0ES collaboration (R11 and R16) diverge from the value reported by recent CMBR observations utilising the Planck satellite and application of the cosmological model by at least . It is among the most challenging problems in contemporary cosmology and is known as the Hubble tension. The SNe Ia in R11 and R16 were calibrated through cepheid variables in three distinct galaxies: Milky Way, LMC, and NGC4258. Carnegie Hubble Program (CHP) observations of type Ia SNe calibrated using the tip of the red giant approach yielded a somewhat different estimate for the Hubble constant. This decreased the Hubble tension from over 3 to below 2. It is a legitimate question to answer whether there are any issues with SNe Ia calibration and to investigate whether the Hubble tension is real or not. We use…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGamma-ray bursts and supernovae · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research · Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
