The integral closure of a primary ideal is not always primary
Nan Li, Zijia Li, Zhi-Hong Yang, Lihong Zhi

TL;DR
This paper provides counterexamples showing that the integral closure of a primary ideal is not always primary, explores Whitney and Zariski equisingularity conditions, and compares different stratifications of a specific hypersurface.
Contribution
It extends Krull's question by providing counterexamples across all characteristics and analyzes the stratification differences of a notable hypersurface.
Findings
Counterexamples to Krull's question in polynomial rings of any characteristic.
The Jacobian ideal of a specific polynomial is a counterexample to primary ideal closure.
Whitney stratification differs from isosingular set stratification for the studied hypersurface.
Abstract
In 1936, Krull asked if the integral closure of a primary ideal is still primary. Fifty years later, Huneke partially answered this question by giving a primary polynomial ideal whose integral closure is not primary in a regular local ring of characteristic . We provide counterexamples to Krull's question regarding polynomial rings with any characteristics. We also find that the Jacobian ideal of the polynomial given by Brian\c{c}on and Speder in 1975 is a counterexample to Krull's question. Let be the hypersurface defined by and be its singular locus. Brian\c{c}on and Speder proved that Whitney equisingularity does not imply Zariski equisingularity by showing that the pair satisfies Whitney's conditions around the origin but fails Zariski's equisingular conditions. We discover that the pair $(V_1…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCommutative Algebra and Its Applications · Polynomial and algebraic computation · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
