TL;DR
This paper introduces a multi-objective evolutionary ensemble learning framework to mitigate unfairness in machine learning by balancing accuracy and multiple fairness measures, outperforming existing methods on several datasets.
Contribution
It proposes a novel multi-objective evolutionary approach to optimize accuracy and fairness simultaneously, and constructs ensembles to better balance these metrics.
Findings
Outperforms state-of-the-art unfairness mitigation methods.
Provides better tradeoffs among accuracy and multiple fairness measures.
Ensembles improve fairness-accuracy balance.
Abstract
In the literature of mitigating unfairness in machine learning, many fairness measures are designed to evaluate predictions of learning models and also utilised to guide the training of fair models. It has been theoretically and empirically shown that there exist conflicts and inconsistencies among accuracy and multiple fairness measures. Optimising one or several fairness measures may sacrifice or deteriorate other measures. Two key questions should be considered, how to simultaneously optimise accuracy and multiple fairness measures, and how to optimise all the considered fairness measures more effectively. In this paper, we view the mitigating unfairness problem as a multi-objective learning problem considering the conflicts among fairness measures. A multi-objective evolutionary learning framework is used to simultaneously optimise several metrics (including accuracy and multiple…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
