Incorporating Participants' Welfare into Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials
Xinru Wang, Nina Deliu, Yusuke Narita, Bibhas Chakraborty

TL;DR
This paper introduces SMART-EXAM, a new SMART design that incorporates participant preferences and predicted effects to enhance welfare and optimize treatment regimes in clinical trials.
Contribution
The paper proposes SMART-EXAM, a novel SMART design that improves participant welfare by integrating preferences and predictions into the randomization process.
Findings
SMART-EXAM improves participant welfare compared to conventional SMART.
SMART-EXAM maintains the ability to identify optimal dynamic treatment regimes.
Application to ADHD data demonstrates practical utility.
Abstract
Dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) are sequences of decision rules that recommend treatments based on patients' time-varying clinical conditions. The sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) is an experimental design that can provide high-quality evidence for constructing optimal DTRs. In a conventional SMART, participants are randomized to available treatments at multiple stages with balanced randomization probabilities. Despite its relative simplicity of implementation and desirable performance in comparing embedded DTRs, the conventional SMART faces inevitable ethical issues including assigning many participants to the empirically inferior treatment or the treatment they dislike, which might slow down the recruitment procedure and lead to higher attrition rates, ultimately leading to poor internal and external validities of the trial results. In this context, we propose…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Economic and Environmental Valuation
