Implications of sparsity and high triangle density for graph representation learning
Hannah Sansford, Alexander Modell, Nick Whiteley, Patrick, Rubin-Delanchy

TL;DR
This paper investigates how sparsity and triangle density in graphs affect the ability to learn accurate node representations, revealing limitations of finite-dimensional models and proposing infinite-dimensional approaches.
Contribution
It demonstrates that sparse, triangle-rich graphs require infinite-dimensional models for accurate representation, challenging the idea that triangles always indicate community structure.
Findings
Finite-dimensional models cannot reproduce certain sparse, triangle-dense graphs.
Infinite-dimensional models with low-dimensional manifolds can represent these graphs.
Local neighborhoods can be represented with lower-dimensional embeddings.
Abstract
Recent work has shown that sparse graphs containing many triangles cannot be reproduced using a finite-dimensional representation of the nodes, in which link probabilities are inner products. Here, we show that such graphs can be reproduced using an infinite-dimensional inner product model, where the node representations lie on a low-dimensional manifold. Recovering a global representation of the manifold is impossible in a sparse regime. However, we can zoom in on local neighbourhoods, where a lower-dimensional representation is possible. As our constructions allow the points to be uniformly distributed on the manifold, we find evidence against the common perception that triangles imply community structure.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Advanced Graph Neural Networks
