The R-Process Alliance: Abundance Universality among Some Elements at and between the First and Second R-Process Peaks
Ian U. Roederer, John J. Cowan, Marco Pignatari, Timothy C. Beers,, Elizabeth A. Den Hartog, Rana Ezzeddine, Anna Frebel, Terese T. Hansen, Erika, M. Holmbeck, Matthew R. Mumpower, Vinicius M. Placco, Charli M. Sakari,, Rebecca Surman, Nicole Vassh

TL;DR
This study provides new observational benchmarks for elements between the first and second r-process peaks in metal-poor stars, revealing a possible universality in their abundance patterns and challenging previous assumptions.
Contribution
It offers the first empirical abundance ratios for elements between the first and second r-process peaks, suggesting a common nucleosynthesis source and potential universality among certain light and heavy r-process elements.
Findings
Small star-to-star abundance dispersion (<= 0.13 dex) among several light r-process elements.
Te abundances correlate more closely with lighter r-process elements than heavier ones.
Evidence supporting r-process universality among some elements at and between the first and second peaks.
Abstract
We present new observational benchmarks of rapid neutron-capture process (r-process) nucleosynthesis for elements at and between the first (A ~ 80) and second (A ~ 130) peaks. Our analysis is based on archival ultraviolet and optical spectroscopy of eight metal-poor stars with Se (Z = 34) or Te (Z = 52) detections, whose r-process enhancement varies by more than a factor of 30 (-0.22 <= [Eu/Fe] <= +1.32). We calculate ratios among the abundances of Se, Sr through Mo (38 <= Z <= 42), and Te. These benchmarks may offer a new empirical alternative to the predicted solar system r-process residual pattern. The Te abundances in these stars correlate more closely with the lighter r-process elements than the heavier ones, contradicting and superseding previous findings. The small star-to-star dispersion among the abundances of Se, Sr, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, and Te (<= 0.13 dex, or 26%) matches that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
