An analysis of degradation in low-cost particulate matter sensors
Priyanka deSouza, Karoline Barkjohn, Andrea Clements, Jenny Lee, Ralph, Kahn, Ben Crawford, Patrick Kinney

TL;DR
This study investigates the performance degradation of PurpleAir low-cost particulate matter sensors over time, revealing increased disagreement, permanent degradation in some sensors, and climate zone effects on sensor longevity.
Contribution
It provides empirically-derived degradation metrics for PurpleAir sensors, highlighting the impact of climate zones and time on sensor accuracy and lifespan.
Findings
4% of sensors flagged after 4 years
2% of sensors permanently degraded
Bias increases by 0.12 ug/m3 per year
Abstract
Low-cost sensors (LCS) are increasingly being used to measure fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations in cities around the world. One of the most commonly deployed LCS is the PurpleAir with about 15,000 sensors deployed in the United States. However, the change in sensor performance over time has not been well studied. It is important to understand the lifespan of these sensors to determine when they should be replaced, and when measurements from these devices should or should not be used for various applications. This paper fills in this gap by leveraging the fact that: 1) Each PurpleAir sensor is comprised of two identical sensors and the divergence between their measurements can be observed, and 2) There are numerous PurpleAir sensors within 50 meters of regulatory monitors allowing for the comparison of measurements between these two instruments. We propose…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
