A long life of excess: The interacting transient SN 2017hcc
S. Moran (1), M. Fraser (2), R. Kotak (1), A. Pastorello (3), S., Benetti (3), S.J. Brennan (2), C.P. Guti\'errez (1, 4), E. Kankare (1), H., Kuncarayakti (1), S. Mattila (1, 5), T.M. Reynolds (1, 6, 7), J.P., Anderson (8), P.J. Brown (9), S. Campana (10), K.C. Chambers (11)

TL;DR
This paper reports a five-year observational study of the long-lived type IIn supernova SN 2017hcc, revealing its interaction with dense circumstellar material, slow evolution, and dust formation processes.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed long-term follow-up of SN 2017hcc, highlighting its unique interaction with CSM and dust evolution over five years.
Findings
Long rise time and high luminosity indicate strong ejecta-CSM interaction.
Infrared excess suggests dust formation and light echo effects.
Spectral blueshifts diminish over time, indicating changing ejecta dynamics.
Abstract
In this study we present the results of a five-year follow-up campaign of the long-lived type IIn supernova SN 2017hcc, found in a spiral dwarf host of near-solar metallicity. The long rise time (57 2 days, ATLAS band) and high luminosity (peaking at 20.78 0.01 mag in the ATLAS band) point towards an interaction of massive ejecta with massive and dense circumstellar material (CSM). The evolution of SN 2017hcc is slow, both spectroscopically and photometrically, reminiscent of the long-lived type IIn, SN 2010jl. An infrared (IR) excess was apparent soon after the peak, and blueshifts were noticeable in the Balmer lines starting from a few hundred days, but appeared to be fading by around +1200 days. We posit that an IR light echo from pre-existing dust dominates at early times, with some possible condensation of new dust grains occurring at epochs >+800 days.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
