Does a portion of dimer configuration determines its domain of definition?
Antoine Bannier, Benoit Laslier

TL;DR
This paper proves that in the wired uniform spanning tree and temperleyan dimer model, boundary condition changes do not have a singular effect on the model's measure away from the boundary, highlighting their robust correlation decay.
Contribution
It establishes the non-singular influence of boundary conditions on these models, advancing understanding of their correlation decay properties.
Findings
Boundary conditions do not have a singular effect away from the boundary.
The models exhibit slow decay of correlations for local observables.
The results apply to the wired uniform spanning tree and temperleyan dimer model.
Abstract
Critical models are, almost by definition, supposed to feature both slow decay of correlations for local observables while retaining some mixing even for macroscopic observables. A strong version of the latter property is that changing boundary conditions cannot have a singular (in the measure theoretic sense) effect on the model away from the boundary, even asymptotically. In this paper we prove that statement for the wired uniform spanning tree and temperleyan dimer model.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMarkov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods · Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics · Theoretical and Computational Physics
