Stringent constraint on CPT violation with the synergy of T2K-II, NO$\nu$A extension, and JUNO
T. V. Ngoc, S. Cao, N. T. Hong Van, P. T. Quyen

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the sensitivity of upcoming neutrino experiments T2K-II, NOvA extension, and JUNO to test CPT symmetry by measuring differences in neutrino and antineutrino oscillation parameters, setting stringent limits on CPT violation.
Contribution
It provides the first empirical sensitivity analysis of combined T2K-II, NOvA, and JUNO data for CPT violation in neutrino oscillations, establishing new potential limits.
Findings
Limits on CPT violation: $| ext{difference in } ext{mass-squared differences}| < 5.3 imes 10^{-3} ext{eV}^2$
Potential to exclude CPT conservation at 4$\sigma$ if current differences persist
Sensitivity depends on true values of mixing angles, especially $ heta_{23}$
Abstract
Neutrino oscillation experiments have measured precisely the mass-squared differences of three neutrino mass eigenstates, and three leptonic mixing angles by utilizing both neutrino and anti-neutrino oscillations. The possible CPT violation may manifest itself in the difference of neutrino and anti-neutrino oscillation parameters, making these experiments promising tools for testing CPT invariance. We investigate empirically the sensitivity of the CPT test via the difference in mass-squared splittings () and in leptonic mixing angles () with the synergy of T2K-II, NOA extension, and JUNO experiments. If the CPT symmetry is found to be conserved, the joint analysis of the three experiments will be able to establish limits of < $5.3\times…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies · Advanced Algebra and Geometry
