Non-Crossing Shortest Paths are Covered with Exactly Four Forests
Lorenzo Balzotti

TL;DR
This paper proves that a set of non-crossing shortest paths in a planar graph can be covered with exactly four forests, providing a tight bound for the minimal number of forests needed.
Contribution
It establishes a tight upper bound of four forests for covering non-crossing shortest paths in certain planar graphs, advancing understanding of path covering in graph theory.
Findings
PCFN(P) 4 for non-crossing shortest paths in planar graphs
The bound of four forests is tight
Applicable when extremal vertices lie on the same face
Abstract
Given a set of paths we define the \emph{Path Covering with Forest Number} of } (PCFN()) as the minimum size of a set of forests satisfying that every path in is contained in at least one forest in . We show that PCFN() is treatable when is a set of non-crossing shortest paths in a plane graph or subclasses. We prove that if is a set of non-crossing shortest paths of a planar graph whose extremal vertices lie on the same face of , then PCFN()\leq 4$, and this bound is tight.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Optimization and Search Problems
