Investigating the cluster production mechanism with isospin triggering: Thermal models versus coalescence models
Apiwit Kittiratpattana, Tom Reichert, Pengcheng Li, Ayut Limphirat,, Christoph Herold, Jan Steinheimer, Marcus Bleicher

TL;DR
This paper compares thermal and coalescence models for light cluster production in heavy ion collisions, using isospin triggering to distinguish the mechanisms and identify the dominant process based on yield patterns.
Contribution
It introduces isospin triggering as a method to differentiate between coalescence and thermal production of light clusters in heavy ion collisions.
Findings
Deuteron yield shows an inverse parabolic dependence on isospin trigger in coalescence models.
Thermal models predict no dependence of cluster yield on isospin trigger.
Observation of a maximum deuteron yield supports the coalescence mechanism.
Abstract
Isospin triggering allows to distinguish coalescence from thermal production of light clusters in heavy ion collisions. Triggering on allows to select very neutron or proton rich final states. The deuteron (cluster) production with coalescence () leads then to an inverse parabolic dependence of the deuteron yield on . In contrast, in a thermal model, cluster production is independent on . The observation of a maximum deuteron (cluster) yield as function of provides confirmation of the coalescence mechanism.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
