Collective Thomson scattering in non-equilibrium laser produced two-stream plasmas
K. Sakai, S. Isayama, N. Bolouki, M. S. Habibi, Y. L. Liu, Y. H., Hsieh, H. H. Chu, J. Wang, S. H. Chen, T. Morita, K. Tomita, R. Yamazaki, Y., Sakawa, S. Matsukiyo, and Y. Kuramitsu

TL;DR
This paper explores the use of collective Thomson scattering to diagnose non-equilibrium two-stream plasmas, combining theoretical, numerical, and experimental approaches to extend plasma diagnostics beyond traditional equilibrium assumptions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of CTS in non-equilibrium plasmas, including theoretical calculations, numerical simulations, and experimental development for laboratory astrophysics applications.
Findings
Feasibility of diagnosing two-stream instability via CTS
Numerical simulations support non-equilibrium CTS analysis
Experimental setup developed for laboratory astrophysics
Abstract
We investigate collective Thomson scattering (CTS) in two-stream non-equilibrium plasmas analytically, numerically and experimentally. In laboratory astrophysics, CTS is a unique tool to obtain local plasma diagnostics. While the standard CTS theory assumes plasmas to be linear, stationary, isotropic and equilibrium, it is often nonlinear, non-stationary, anisotropic, and non-equilibrium in high energy phenomena relevant to laboratory astrophysics. We theoretically calculate and numerically simulate the CTS spectra in two-stream plasmas as a typical example of non-equilibrium system in space and astrophysical plasmas. The simulation results show the feasibility to diagnose two-stream instability directly via CTS measurements. In order to confirm the non-equilibrium CTS analysis, we have been developing experimental system with high repetition rate table top laser for laboratory…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
