Local intraspecific aggregation in phytoplankton model communities: spatial scales of occurrence and implications for coexistence

TL;DR

This study models phytoplankton spatial aggregation at microscale to understand its role in species coexistence, revealing size-dependent spatial structures that influence competitive interactions.

Contribution

It introduces a three-dimensional multispecies individual-based model linking spatial aggregation to phytoplankton diversity, incorporating hydrodynamics and spatial moment equations.

Findings

Small phytoplankton form monospecific clusters

Spatial structure favors intra-specific interactions for small phytoplankton

Large phytoplankton neighborhoods are more mixed

Abstract

The coexistence of multiple phytoplankton species despite their reliance on similar resources is often explained with mean-field models assuming mixed populations. In reality, observations of phytoplankton indicate spatial aggregation at all scales, including at the scale of a few individuals. Local spatial aggregation can hinder competitive exclusion since individuals then interact mostly with other individuals of their own species, rather than competitors from different species. To evaluate how microscale spatial aggregation might explain phytoplankton diversity maintenance, an individual-based, multispecies representation of cells in a hydrodynamic environment is required. We formulate a three-dimensional and multispecies individual-based model of phytoplankton population dynamics at the Kolmogorov scale. The model is studied through both simulations and the derivation of spatial moment equations, in connection with point process theory. The spatial moment equations show a good match between theory and simulations. We parameterized the model based on phytoplankters' ecological and physical characteristics, for both large and small phytoplankton. Defining a zone of potential interactions as the overlap between nutrient depletion volumes, we show that local species composition -- within the range of possible interactions -- depends on the size class of phytoplankton. In small phytoplankton, individuals remain in mostly monospecific clusters. Spatial structure therefore favours intra- over inter-specific interactions for small phytoplankton, contributing to coexistence. Large phytoplankton cell neighbourhoods appear more mixed. Although some small-scale self-organizing spatial structure remains and could influence coexistence mechanisms, other factors may need to be explored to explain diversity maintenance in large phytoplankton.