Estimating the Convective Turnover Time
Wei-Chun Jao, Andrew A Couperus, Eliot H. Vrijmoet, Nicholas J Wright, and Todd J. Henry

TL;DR
This paper critiques existing methods of estimating stellar convective turnover time, highlighting biases in current relations, and advocates for multi-dimensional, data-driven models using Gaia data for improved accuracy.
Contribution
It identifies inaccuracies in current $ au$-mass relations for G and M dwarfs and proposes a new approach using multi-dimensional relations based on Gaia data and theoretical models.
Findings
Current $ au$-mass relations overestimate for G dwarfs.
Current $ au$-mass relations underestimate for late M dwarfs.
A multi-dimensional approach can improve $ au$ estimation accuracy.
Abstract
The introduction of the Rossby number (R), which incorporates the convective turnover time (), in 1984 was a pioneering idea for understanding the correlation between stellar rotation and activity. The convective turnover time, which cannot be measured directly, is often inferred using existing -mass or -color relations, typically established based on an ensemble of different types of stars by assuming that is a function of mass. In this work, we use {\it Gaia} Early Data Release 3 to demonstrate that the masses used to establish one of the most cited -mass relations are overestimated for G type dwarfs and significantly underestimated for late M dwarfs, offsets that affect studies using this -mass relation to draw conclusions. We discuss the challenges of creating such relations then and now. In the era of {\it Gaia} and other large datasets,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research · Educational Leadership and Practices
