On the pitfalls of Gaussian likelihood scoring for causal discovery
Christoph Schultheiss, Peter B\"uhlmann

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limitations of using Gaussian likelihood scores for causal discovery, revealing that such methods can fail under model misspecification, especially with non-Gaussian errors.
Contribution
The paper provides a theoretical analysis showing the failure modes of Gaussian likelihood scoring in causal discovery when errors are non-Gaussian.
Findings
Gaussian likelihood scoring can be inconsistent with non-Gaussian errors
Model misspecification leads to incorrect causal inferences
Nonparametric regression does not mitigate Gaussian score pitfalls
Abstract
We consider likelihood score-based methods for causal discovery in structural causal models. In particular, we focus on Gaussian scoring and analyze the effect of model misspecification in terms of non-Gaussian error distribution. We present a surprising negative result for Gaussian likelihood scoring in combination with nonparametric regression methods.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
