Cluster expansion methods from physical concepts
Paul E. Lammert, Vincent H. Crespi

TL;DR
This paper reconstructs the cluster expansion formalism in materials science using an axiomatic approach, emphasizing intrinsic definitions and Hilbert space geometry to improve clarity and computational robustness.
Contribution
It introduces an axiomatic, intrinsic framework for cluster expansion, avoiding conventional cluster functions and addressing underdetermination issues with a geometry-based fitting method.
Findings
Intrinsic cluster components defined via Moebius inversion
Model fitting grounded in Hilbert space geometry
Avoids underdetermination in model construction
Abstract
The cluster expansion formalism used in materials science is reconstructed on an axiomatic basis with the aims of clarifying underlying concepts and improving computational procedures, and without using conventional cluster functions. Instead, cluster components of configuration functions are defined in an intrinsic manner, which can be viewed as Moebius inversion of conditional expectation. The associated method for fitting a model to a configurational sample is grounded entirely in Hilbert space geometry. By constructing models directly from the given data, we avoid an underdetermination problem to which the conventional approach is subject. Tensor observables are treated on an equal footing with scalar observables.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCatalysis and Oxidation Reactions · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Machine Learning in Materials Science
