TL;DR
This paper presents a comprehensive framework that integrates moral assessment and statistical criteria to develop fair prediction-based decision systems, extending the FEC principle to cover all group fairness types and account for morally irrelevant factors.
Contribution
It introduces a step-by-step procedure combining ethical analysis with statistical fairness criteria and extends the FEC principle to encompass all group fairness types and relaxations.
Findings
The framework covers independence, separation, and sufficiency fairness criteria.
Extended FEC accounts for morally irrelevant elements and relaxations.
Provides a method to incorporate fairness into optimal decision making.
Abstract
Ensuring fairness of prediction-based decision making is based on statistical group fairness criteria. Which one of these criteria is the morally most appropriate one depends on the context, and its choice requires an ethical analysis. In this paper, we present a step-by-step procedure integrating three elements: (a) a framework for the moral assessment of what fairness means in a given context, based on the recently proposed general principle of "Fair equality of chances" (FEC) (b) a mapping of the assessment's results to established statistical group fairness criteria, and (c) a method for integrating the thus-defined fairness into optimal decision making. As a second contribution, we show new applications of the FEC principle and show that, with this extension, the FEC framework covers all types of group fairness criteria: independence, separation, and sufficiency. Third, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
