GRB 180325A: dust grain-size distribution and interstellar iron nanoparticles contribution

TL;DR

This study models dust grain-size distributions in a gamma-ray burst environment, finding silicates and PAHs dominate extinction, while iron nanoparticles are insignificant, highlighting the complexity of interstellar dust contributions.

Contribution

First application of iron nanoparticle grain-size distributions to model GRB extinction curves, demonstrating their negligible role compared to silicates and PAHs.

Findings

Iron nanoparticles contribution is insignificant.

Silicates and PAHs dominate the extinction curve.

Dust destruction likely occurred during the GRB event.

Abstract

We modelled dust grain-size distributions for carbonaceous and silicates dust, as well as for free-flying iron nanoparticles in the environment of a $\gamma$-ray burst (GRB) afterglow, GRB 180325A. This GRB, at $z=2.2486$, has an unambiguous detection of the 2175 \r{A} extinction feature with $R_V=4.58$ and $A_V=1.58$. In addition to silicates, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), and graphite, we used iron nanoparticles grain-size distributions for the first time to model the observed extinction curve of GRB 180325A. We fit the observed extinction for four model permutations, using 232 sets of silicates, graphite, carbon abundance in hydrocarbon molecules ($b_C$), and fraction of iron abundance in free-flying nanoparticles ($b_{\text{Fe}}$). These four different permutations were chosen to test iron nanoparticles significance and carbon abundance in hydrocarbons. Our results indicate that iron nanoparticles contribution is insignificant and there is a degeneracy of carbon abundances, with the range $(0.0 \leq b_C \leq 0.7)\times10^{-5}$ providing the best-fit to the observed extinction curve of GRB 180325A. We therefore favour the simplest model of silicates and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. The silicates are dominant and contribute to the entire wavelength range of the GRB extinction curve while graphite contributes towards both the 2175 \r{A} bump and the UV extinction. The afterglow peak luminosity ($1.5\times10^{51}$ ergs/s) indicates dust destruction may have taken place. We conclude that further investigations into other potential contributors of extinction are warranted, particularly for steep UV extinction.