Understanding CNN Fragility When Learning With Imbalanced Data

TL;DR

This paper investigates how CNNs process latent features in imbalanced data, revealing that their ability to generalize to minority classes depends on class feature diversity and magnitude, which has implications for re-sampling strategies.

Contribution

It introduces a feature-based analysis of CNNs on imbalanced data, highlighting the importance of latent class diversity and feature magnitude for generalization.

Findings

CNN learns limited class top-K features that vary with data balance.

Generalization depends on matching feature magnitudes between training and test.

Latent class diversity is crucial, beyond just class sample size.

Abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have achieved impressive results on imbalanced image data, but they still have difficulty generalizing to minority classes and their decisions are difficult to interpret. These problems are related because the method by which CNNs generalize to minority classes, which requires improvement, is wrapped in a blackbox. To demystify CNN decisions on imbalanced data, we focus on their latent features. Although CNNs embed the pattern knowledge learned from a training set in model parameters, the effect of this knowledge is contained in feature and classification embeddings (FE and CE). These embeddings can be extracted from a trained model and their global, class properties (e.g., frequency, magnitude and identity) can be analyzed. We find that important information regarding the ability of a neural network to generalize to minority classes resides in the class top-K CE and FE. We show that a CNN learns a limited number of class top-K CE per category, and that their number and magnitudes vary based on whether the same class is balanced or imbalanced. This calls into question whether a CNN has learned intrinsic class features, or merely frequently occurring ones that happen to exist in the sampled class distribution. We also hypothesize that latent class diversity is as important as the number of class examples, which has important implications for re-sampling and cost-sensitive methods. These methods generally focus on rebalancing model weights, class numbers and margins; instead of diversifying class latent features through augmentation. We also demonstrate that a CNN has difficulty generalizing to test data if the magnitude of its top-K latent features do not match the training set. We use three popular image datasets and two cost-sensitive algorithms commonly employed in imbalanced learning for our experiments.