Artificial Intelligence Nomenclature Identified From Delphi Study on Key Issues Related to Trust and Barriers to Adoption for Autonomous Systems
Thomas E. Doyle, Victoria Tucci, Calvin Zhu, Yifei Zhang and, Basem Yassa, Sajjad Rashidiani, Md Asif Khan, Reza Samavi and, Michael Noseworthy, Steven Yule

TL;DR
This paper uses a Delphi study with international experts to identify and rank key issues, definitions, and barriers related to trust and adoption of autonomous systems in artificial intelligence.
Contribution
It provides a consensus-based nomenclature and highlights critical trust issues and barriers across multiple disciplines for autonomous AI systems.
Findings
Top concerns and barriers identified and ranked by experts
Summary of literature definitions for AI nomenclature
Cross-disciplinary consensus on trust issues
Abstract
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence across traditional research domains has generated an amalgamation of nomenclature. As cross-discipline teams work together on complex machine learning challenges, finding a consensus of basic definitions in the literature is a more fundamental problem. As a step in the Delphi process to define issues with trust and barriers to the adoption of autonomous systems, our study first collected and ranked the top concerns from a panel of international experts from the fields of engineering, computer science, medicine, aerospace, and defence, with experience working with artificial intelligence. This document presents a summary of the literature definitions for nomenclature derived from expert feedback.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBig Data and Business Intelligence · Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications · Technology Assessment and Management
