Adaptive Contrastive Learning with Dynamic Correlation for Multi-Phase Organ Segmentation

TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel organ-level contrastive loss that dynamically models contrast relationships in multi-phase CT scans, significantly improving multi-organ segmentation accuracy over state-of-the-art methods.

Contribution

It proposes a data-driven, organ-wise contrast correlation matrix to adapt contrastive learning for multi-phase CT segmentation, capturing fine-grained contrast variations.

Findings

Achieved 1.41% and 2.02% improvements in Dice scores on NCCT and CECT datasets.

Significantly improved Dice scores on MICCAI 2021 FLARE Challenge datasets.

Demonstrated robustness across different contrast phases and datasets.

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated the superior performance of introducing ``scan-wise" contrast labels into contrastive learning for multi-organ segmentation on multi-phase computed tomography (CT). However, such scan-wise labels are limited: (1) a coarse classification, which could not capture the fine-grained ``organ-wise" contrast variations across all organs; (2) the label (i.e., contrast phase) is typically manually provided, which is error-prone and may introduce manual biases of defining phases. In this paper, we propose a novel data-driven contrastive loss function that adapts the similar/dissimilar contrast relationship between samples in each minibatch at organ-level. Specifically, as variable levels of contrast exist between organs, we hypothesis that the contrast differences in the organ-level can bring additional context for defining representations in the latent space. An organ-wise contrast correlation matrix is computed with mean organ intensities under one-hot attention maps. The goal of adapting the organ-driven correlation matrix is to model variable levels of feature separability at different phases. We evaluate our proposed approach on multi-organ segmentation with both non-contrast CT (NCCT) datasets and the MICCAI 2015 BTCV Challenge contrast-enhance CT (CECT) datasets. Compared to the state-of-the-art approaches, our proposed contrastive loss yields a substantial and significant improvement of 1.41% (from 0.923 to 0.936, p-value$<$0.01) and 2.02% (from 0.891 to 0.910, p-value$<$0.01) on mean Dice scores across all organs with respect to NCCT and CECT cohorts. We further assess the trained model performance with the MICCAI 2021 FLARE Challenge CECT datasets and achieve a substantial improvement of mean Dice score from 0.927 to 0.934 (p-value$<$0.01). The code is available at: https://github.com/MASILab/DCC_CL