Computing a Stable Distance on Merge Trees
Brian Bollen, Pasindu Tennakoon, and Joshua A. Levine

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new distance measure for merge trees that balances discriminativity and stability, enabling effective comparison of scalar fields while remaining computationally feasible for small trees.
Contribution
We propose a practical distance measure on merge trees that preserves both discriminativity and stability, with theoretical guarantees and applications in shape comparison and periodicity detection.
Findings
The proposed distance retains discriminativity and stability properties.
Persistence simplification affects the distance by at most half of the simplified value.
Application examples include shape comparison and vortex street periodicity detection.
Abstract
Distances on merge trees facilitate visual comparison of collections of scalar fields. Two desirable properties for these distances to exhibit are 1) the ability to discern between scalar fields which other, less complex topological summaries cannot and 2) to still be robust to perturbations in the dataset. The combination of these two properties, known respectively as stability and discriminativity, has led to theoretical distances which are either thought to be or shown to be computationally complex and thus their implementations have been scarce. In order to design similarity measures on merge trees which are computationally feasible for more complex merge trees, many researchers have elected to loosen the restrictions on at least one of these two properties. The question still remains, however, if there are practical situations where trading these desirable properties is necessary.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
