Algebras with a bilinear form, and Idempotent endomorphisms
Alberto Facchini, Leila Heidari Zadeh

TL;DR
This paper establishes an equivalence between the category of algebras with bilinear forms and a specific class of unital algebras with compatible bilinear forms, revealing structural insights and categorical relationships.
Contribution
It introduces a categorical equivalence linking algebras with bilinear forms to unital algebras with compatible bilinear forms, clarifying their structural relationship.
Findings
Category of algebras with bilinear forms is equivalent to a category of unital algebras with compatible forms.
Weak augmentations correspond to certain splitting monomorphisms in the module category.
Structural isomorphism between categories clarifies algebraic and categorical properties.
Abstract
The category of all -algebras with a bilinear form, whose objects are all pairs where is a -algebra and is a bilinear mapping, is equivalent to the category of unital -algebras for which the canonical homomorphism of unital -algebras is a splitting monomorphism in the category of -modules. Call the left inverses of this splitting monomorphism "weak augmentations" of the algebra. There is a category isomorphism between the category of -algebras with a weak augmentation and the category of unital -algebras with a bilinear form compatible with the multiplication of , i.e., such that for all for which .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topics in Algebra · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
