Reflections on trusting distributed trust
Emma Dauterman, Vivian Fang, Natacha Crooks, Raluca Ada Popa

TL;DR
This paper proposes a framework for publicly auditable distributed trust systems, enabling organizations to verify trust deployment using secure hardware and append-only logs, addressing deployment challenges.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach allowing users to audit distributed trust systems post-deployment, using two key building blocks: secure hardware and append-only logs.
Findings
Framework enables efficient, cheap setup of auditable distributed trust systems.
Leverages existing secure hardware and logging implementations.
Provides infrastructure recommendations for easier deployment.
Abstract
Many systems today distribute trust across multiple parties such that the system provides certain security properties if a subset of the parties are honest. In the past few years, we have seen an explosion of academic and industrial cryptographic systems built on distributed trust, including secure multi-party computation applications (e.g., private analytics, secure learning, and private key recovery) and blockchains. These systems have great potential for improving security and privacy, but face a significant hurdle on the path to deployment. We initiate study of the following problem: a single organization is, by definition, a single party, and so how can a single organization build a distributed-trust system where corruptions are independent? We instead consider an alternative formulation of the problem: rather than ensuring that a distributed-trust system is set up correctly by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
