The Invariant Ground Truth of Affect
Konstantinos Makantasis, Kosmas Pinitas, Antonios Liapis, Georgios N., Yannakakis

TL;DR
This paper proposes a causation-based approach to identify an invariant ground truth of affect, improving robustness and accuracy of affect models across different tasks and participants.
Contribution
It introduces a novel causation-inspired method for detecting outliers and establishing a reliable affect ground truth, addressing biases in subjective affect annotations.
Findings
Successfully detects outliers in affective data
Enhances accuracy of affect models across tasks
First integration of causation tools in affective computing
Abstract
Affective computing strives to unveil the unknown relationship between affect elicitation, manifestation of affect and affect annotations. The ground truth of affect, however, is predominately attributed to the affect labels which inadvertently include biases inherent to the subjective nature of emotion and its labeling. The response to such limitations is usually augmenting the dataset with more annotations per data point; however, this is not possible when we are interested in self-reports via first-person annotation. Moreover, outlier detection methods based on inter-annotator agreement only consider the annotations themselves and ignore the context and the corresponding affect manifestation. This paper reframes the ways one may obtain a reliable ground truth of affect by transferring aspects of causation theory to affective computing. In particular, we assume that the ground truth…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMental Health Research Topics · Emotion and Mood Recognition · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
MethodsTest
