Revisiting Heterophily For Graph Neural Networks
Sitao Luan, Chenqing Hua, Qincheng Lu, Jiaqi Zhu, Mingde Zhao, Shuyuan, Zhang, Xiao-Wen Chang, Doina Precup

TL;DR
This paper introduces new heterophily metrics and an adaptive framework called ACM that significantly improves GNN performance on heterophilic graphs by effectively combining aggregation and diversification strategies.
Contribution
It proposes novel heterophily metrics based on post-aggregation node similarity and introduces ACM, a flexible framework that enhances GNNs by adaptively mixing channels for better node classification.
Findings
ACM outperforms traditional GNNs on heterophilic graphs.
New heterophily metrics better capture node similarity post-aggregation.
ACM achieves significant performance gains on benchmark datasets.
Abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) extend basic Neural Networks (NNs) by using graph structures based on the relational inductive bias (homophily assumption). While GNNs have been commonly believed to outperform NNs in real-world tasks, recent work has identified a non-trivial set of datasets where their performance compared to NNs is not satisfactory. Heterophily has been considered the main cause of this empirical observation and numerous works have been put forward to address it. In this paper, we first revisit the widely used homophily metrics and point out that their consideration of only graph-label consistency is a shortcoming. Then, we study heterophily from the perspective of post-aggregation node similarity and define new homophily metrics, which are potentially advantageous compared to existing ones. Based on this investigation, we prove that some harmful cases of heterophily can…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Neural Networks · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
