The Complexity of NISQ

TL;DR

This paper defines the NISQ complexity class to analyze the computational power of noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, demonstrating their limitations and capabilities through theoretical separations and problem-specific results.

Contribution

It introduces the NISQ class, provides evidence of its position between BPP and BQP, and analyzes its limitations on specific computational problems.

Findings

NISQ is strictly larger than BPP but smaller than BQP.

NISQ cannot achieve Grover-like quadratic speedup.

NISQ is exponentially weaker than noiseless quantum circuits for state learning.

Abstract

The recent proliferation of NISQ devices has made it imperative to understand their computational power. In this work, we define and study the complexity class $\textsf{NISQ} $, which is intended to encapsulate problems that can be efficiently solved by a classical computer with access to a NISQ device. To model existing devices, we assume the device can (1) noisily initialize all qubits, (2) apply many noisy quantum gates, and (3) perform a noisy measurement on all qubits. We first give evidence that $\textsf{BPP}\subsetneq \textsf{NISQ}\subsetneq \textsf{BQP}$, by demonstrating super-polynomial oracle separations among the three classes, based on modifications of Simon's problem. We then consider the power of $\textsf{NISQ}$ for three well-studied problems. For unstructured search, we prove that $\textsf{NISQ}$ cannot achieve a Grover-like quadratic speedup over $\textsf{BPP}$. For the Bernstein-Vazirani problem, we show that $\textsf{NISQ}$ only needs a number of queries logarithmic in what is required for $\textsf{BPP}$. Finally, for a quantum state learning problem, we prove that $\textsf{NISQ}$ is exponentially weaker than classical computation with access to noiseless constant-depth quantum circuits.