Are supercooled liquids Fickian yet non Gaussian?
Ludovic Berthier, Elijah Flenner, Grzegorz Szamel

TL;DR
This paper critiques a recent study claiming that glass-forming liquids exhibit Fickian yet non-Gaussian diffusion, arguing that the reported scales are not well-defined and that the conclusions are not supported.
Contribution
The authors clarify misconceptions about the scales in glass-formers and dispute the claim that these systems show Fickian non-Gaussian behavior.
Findings
The reported length and time scales are either previously characterized or ill-defined.
The paper disputes the existence of Fickian non-Gaussian diffusion in glass-formers.
It questions the interpretation of dynamic heterogeneity in the context of the criticized study.
Abstract
Comment on `Fickian Non-Gaussian Diffusion in Glass-Forming Liquids', by Rusciano et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 168001 (2022). In a recent Letter, Rusciano et al. examined the statistics of individual particles displacements in two-dimensional glass-formers and concluded that the corresponding probability distribution is non-Gaussian in a time regime where the mean-squared displacement is Fickian. Here, we clarify that the multiple length scales and time scales reported in this work have either been characterized before, or are not well-defined. This leads us to dispute the conclusions that glass-formers display Fickian non-Gaussian behaviour and that this analogy fruitfully addresses the central questions regarding the nature of dynamic heterogeneity in these systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
