Analysis of publications by authors of Ukrainian institutes in Scopus-delisted titles
Serhii Nazarovets

TL;DR
This study analyzes the extent and impact of Ukrainian researchers publishing in Scopus-delisted journals from 2011 to 2020, revealing significant publication and citation practices in certain fields and institutions.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive analysis of Ukrainian publications in delisted titles, highlighting implications for research evaluation systems.
Findings
46.92% of Ukrainian papers in economics were in delisted journals
Two institutions' delisted papers received citations exceeding average Scopus papers
Delisted publications significantly influence Ukrainian research metrics
Abstract
In Ukraine, Scopus data are used to evaluate academics. Existing shortcomings in the Ukrainian evaluation system allow them to publish in titles that have been delisted from Scopus, and continue to use those papers as credible research output for evaluation. The purpose of this study was to analyse the publishing activity of Ukrainian institutions in Scopus-delisted titles (as of September 2021) in different fields between 2011 and 2020 and to attempt to appreciate how common this practice is among Ukrainian authors. Scopus was sourced to collect bibliographic and citations-related data, while SciVal was used to analyse these data. The findings suggest that for 17 Ukrainian institutions, papers from titles that have been delisted from Scopus still play an important part of the publication achievement of their employees. In particular, in the field of economics, econometrics and finance,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
