Adult-child pairs walking down stairs: Empirical analysis and optimal-step-based modeling of a complex pedestrian flow, with an exploration of flow-improvement strategies
Chuan-Zhi Xie (BUAA, ILM), Tie-Qiao Tang (BUAA), Bo-Tao Zhang (CUHK),, Alexandre Nicolas (ILM, DR7 du CNRS)

TL;DR
This study analyzes pedestrian flow of adult-child pairs descending stairs in China, developing a semi-continuous model based on empirical observations to evaluate strategies for improving egress efficiency and safety.
Contribution
It introduces a novel semi-continuous, optimal-step-based model for heterogeneous adult-child pairs in complex stairwell geometries, validated by empirical data.
Findings
Promoting front-back pairing can increase flow efficiency.
Encouraging detours may reduce overall flow.
Shifting class end times reduces egress time by at least 10%.
Abstract
Pedestrian egress from training schools in the after-class period (especially in China, as children walk down stairs together with their parents) raises practical concerns related to degraded flow conditions and possible safety hazards, but also represents a challenge to mainstream modeling approaches for several reasons: they involve heterogeneous groups (adult-child pairs), which are hardly studied compared to their homogeneous counterparts, in a complex geometry, made of staircases connected by a platform where pedestrians rotate, and over a wide range of densities. In light of our field observations at a training school in China, we develop a semi-continuous model which quantitatively reproduces the collective dynamics observed empirically and enables us to assess some guidance strategies to improve egress efficiency. In this model, which extends the optimal step approach, adults…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
