Equal Improvability: A New Fairness Notion Considering the Long-term Impact
Ozgur Guldogan, Yuchen Zeng, Jy-yong Sohn, Ramtin Pedarsani, Kangwook, Lee

TL;DR
This paper introduces Equal Improvability (EI), a new fairness notion for classifiers that considers the long-term impact of individuals improving their features over time, promoting fairness across dynamic scenarios.
Contribution
The paper proposes the EI fairness notion, analyzes its properties, and develops three methods to optimize classifiers under EI constraints for long-term fairness.
Findings
EI encourages classifiers to be fair in long-term scenarios.
EI-regularized algorithms effectively promote long-term fairness.
Experimental results show EI's advantages in dynamic fairness settings.
Abstract
Devising a fair classifier that does not discriminate against different groups is an important problem in machine learning. Although researchers have proposed various ways of defining group fairness, most of them only focused on the immediate fairness, ignoring the long-term impact of a fair classifier under the dynamic scenario where each individual can improve its feature over time. Such dynamic scenarios happen in real world, e.g., college admission and credit loaning, where each rejected sample makes effort to change its features to get accepted afterwards. In this dynamic setting, the long-term fairness should equalize the samples' feature distribution across different groups after the rejected samples make some effort to improve. In order to promote long-term fairness, we propose a new fairness notion called Equal Improvability (EI), which equalizes the potential acceptance rate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI
