Can Calibration Improve Sample Prioritization?
Ganesh Tata, Gautham Krishna Gudur, Gopinath Chennupati, Mohammad, Emtiyaz Khan

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that calibration techniques can enhance sample prioritization in training deep neural networks, leading to better subset selection, fewer examples per epoch, and faster overall training.
Contribution
It introduces the use of calibration methods for sample prioritization, showing they improve subset quality and training efficiency in deep learning.
Findings
Calibration improves subset quality for training
Reduces examples per epoch by at least 70%
Speeds up overall training process
Abstract
Calibration can reduce overconfident predictions of deep neural networks, but can calibration also accelerate training? In this paper, we show that it can when used to prioritize some examples for performing subset selection. We study the effect of popular calibration techniques in selecting better subsets of samples during training (also called sample prioritization) and observe that calibration can improve the quality of subsets, reduce the number of examples per epoch (by at least 70%), and can thereby speed up the overall training process. We further study the effect of using calibrated pre-trained models coupled with calibration during training to guide sample prioritization, which again seems to improve the quality of samples selected.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Data Classification · Neural Networks and Applications · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
MethodsSPEED: Separable Pyramidal Pooling EncodEr-Decoder for Real-Time Monocular Depth Estimation on Low-Resource Settings
