Quantifying hierarchy in scientific teams
Fengli Xu, Lingfei Wu, James A. Evans

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method to quantify the implicit hierarchy within scientific teams using publication features and evaluates how this hierarchy impacts scientific output, providing insights into team dynamics and innovation.
Contribution
It presents a novel approach to measure team hierarchy in scientific collaborations and assesses its influence on research productivity and impact.
Findings
Hierarchy correlates with research impact
Quantitative metrics for team structure
Implications for fostering innovation
Abstract
This paper provides a detailed description of the data collection and machine learning model used in our recent PNAS paper "Flat Teams Drive Scientific Innovation" Xu et al. [2022a]. Here, we discuss how the features of scientific publication can be used to estimate the implicit hierarchy in the corresponding author teams. Besides, we also describe the method of evaluating the impact of team hierarchy on scientific outputs. More details will be updated in this article continuously. Raw data and Readme document can be accessed in this GitHub repository Xu et al. [2022b].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBig Data and Business Intelligence · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
