TL;DR
This paper critiques the many-worlds interpretation of quantum theory by arguing that total entanglement leaves no space for creativity, challenging the validity of MWI based on its implications.
Contribution
It presents a philosophical argument against MWI, emphasizing the consequences of universal entanglement and contesting its validity since its inception.
Findings
MWI implies no room for creativity due to total entanglement
The paper challenges the validity of MWI since 2010
Provides a philosophical critique of quantum interpretation
Abstract
I argue against the many-world interpretation (MWI) of quantum theory by emphasizing that when everything is entangled with everything else, in one big monstrous piece, there is no room left for creativity. Since the MWI was invented, it proves itself wrong (appeared first in French in [N. Gisin, L'\'epid\'emie du multivers, in Le plus grand des hasards, p. 184, eds J.F. Dars et A. Papillault, Belin 2010]).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhilosophy and History of Science · History of Science and Medicine