On Uniform Confidence Intervals for the Tail Index and the Extreme Quantile
Yuya Sasaki, Yulong Wang

TL;DR
This paper investigates the challenges of constructing uniform confidence intervals for tail index and extreme quantiles, proving an impossibility result and proposing honest intervals that account for worst-case bias, validated through simulations and real data.
Contribution
It establishes an impossibility result for length-optimal uniform confidence intervals and introduces a method for honest intervals that incorporate worst-case bias.
Findings
Impossibility of length-optimal uniform confidence intervals under certain conditions
Proposed honest confidence intervals are valid across a non-parametric family
Method successfully applied to simulated and real-world data sets
Abstract
This paper presents two results concerning uniform confidence intervals for the tail index and the extreme quantile. First, we show that it is impossible to construct a length-optimal confidence interval satisfying the correct uniform coverage over a local non-parametric family of tail distributions. Second, in light of the impossibility result, we construct honest confidence intervals that are uniformly valid by incorporating the worst-case bias in the local non-parametric family. The proposed method is applied to simulated data and a real data set of National Vital Statistics from National Center for Health Statistics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
