Dosimetric Evaluation of a New Rotating Gamma System for Stereotactic Radiosurgery

TL;DR

This study evaluates a new rotating gamma system (Galaxy RTi) for stereotactic radiosurgery, demonstrating comparable or improved dosimetric quality, faster treatment times, and real-time image guidance compared to the established Leksell Gamma Knife system.

Contribution

The paper introduces the Galaxy RTi system and compares its dosimetric performance with the Leksell Gamma Knife, showing advantages in treatment efficiency and dose fall-off.

Findings

Galaxy achieves similar target coverage and conformity as LGK.

Galaxy has shorter beam-on time than LGK.

Galaxy exhibits faster dose fall-off.

Abstract

Purpose: A novel rotating gamma stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) system (Galaxy RTi) with real-time image guidance technology has been developed for high-precision SRS and frameless fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). This work investigated the dosimetric quality of Galaxy by comparing both the machine treatment parameters and plan dosimetry parameters with those of the widely used Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) systems for SRS. Methods: The Galaxy RTi system uses 30 cobalt-60 sources on a rotating gantry to deliver non-coplanar, non-overlapping arcs simultaneously while the LGK 4C uses 201 static cobalt-60 sources to deliver noncoplanar beams. Ten brain cancer patients were unarchived from our clinical database, which were previously treated on the LGK 4C. The lesion volume for these cases varied from 0.1 cm3 to 15.4 cm3. Galaxy plans were generated using the Prowess TPS (Prowess, Concord, CA) with the same dose constraints and optimization parameters. Treatment quality metrics such as target coverage (%volume receiving the prescription dose), conformity index (CI), cone size, shots number, beam-on time were compared together with DVH curves and dose distributions. Results: Superior treatment plans were generated for the Galaxy system that met our clinical acceptance criteria. For the 10 patients investigated, the mean CI and dose coverage for Galaxy was 1.77 and 99.24 compared to 1.94 and 99.19 for LGK, respectively. The beam-on time for Galaxy was 17.42 minutes compared to 21.34 minutes for LGK (both assuming dose rates at the initial installation). The dose fall-off is much faster for Galaxy, compared with LGK. Conclusion: The Galaxy RTi system can provide dose distributions with similar quality to that of LGK with less beam-on time and faster dose fall-off. The system is also capable of real-time image guidance at treatment position to ensure accurate dose delivery for SRS.