The closure relations in optical afterglow of Gamma-Ray Bursts
M.G.Dainotti, D.Levine, D.Warren, N.Fraija, S.Sourav

TL;DR
This study analyzes optical afterglow data of 82 Gamma-Ray Bursts to test closure relations in different environments, confirming the most favored spectral regime and refining correlations that could enable GRBs as standard candles.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive test of closure relations in optical afterglows across different environments and regimes, enhancing understanding of GRB emission mechanisms and standardization potential.
Findings
Nu > max nu c, nu m regime is most favored
2D Dainotti correlation shows consistent scatter with previous studies
Refined subsamples of GRBs for emission mechanism insights
Abstract
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are extremely high-energy events that can be observed at very high redshift. In addition to gamma rays, they can emit in X-ray, optical, and sometimes radio wavelengths. Here, following the approach in Srinivasaragavan et al. (2020); Dainotti et al. (2021b,c), and Dainotti et al (2022, submitted), we consider 82 GRBs from Dainotti et al. (2022a) that have been observed in optical wavelengths and fitted with a broken power law (BPL). We consider the relations between the spectral and temporal indices (closure relations; CRs) according to the synchrotron forward-shock model evolving in the constant-density interstellar medium (ISM; k = 0) and the stellar Wind environment (k = 2) in both slow- and fast-cooling regimes, where the density profile is defined as n is proportional to r to the power minus k. We find the nu > max nuc, nu m regime is most favored, where nu…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
