Three-sided pyramid wavefront sensor. II. Preliminary demonstration on the new CACTI testbed

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates a three-sided pyramid wavefront sensor on the CACTI testbed, showing it performs comparably to the traditional four-sided sensor with benefits in manufacturing and noise sensitivity, for adaptive optics in large telescopes.

Contribution

It introduces and tests a three-sided pyramid wavefront sensor as a practical alternative to the four-sided version for high-contrast imaging in giant telescopes.

Findings

3PWFS has similar performance to 4PWFS when properly tuned.

3PWFS is less sensitive to read noise due to fewer detector pixels.

Manufacturing of 3PWFS is easier than 4PWFS.

Abstract

The next generation of giant ground and space telescopes will have the light-collecting power to detect and characterize potentially habitable terrestrial exoplanets using high-contrast imaging for the first time. This will only be achievable if the performance of Giant Segmented Mirror Telescopes (GSMTs) extreme adaptive optics (ExAO) systems are optimized to their full potential. A key component of an ExAO system is the wavefront sensor (WFS), which measures aberrations from atmospheric turbulence. A common choice in current and next-generation instruments is the pyramid wavefront sensor (PWFS). ExAO systems require high spatial and temporal sampling of wavefronts to optimize performance, and as a result, require large detectors for the WFS. We present a closed-loop testbed demonstration of a three-sided pyramid wavefront sensor (3PWFS) as an alternative to the conventional four-sided pyramid wavefront (4PWFS) sensor for GSMT-ExAO applications on the new Comprehensive Adaptive Optics and Coronagraph Test Instrument (CACTI). The 3PWFS is less sensitive to read noise than the 4PWFS because it uses fewer detector pixels. The 3PWFS has further benefits: a high-quality three-sided pyramid optic is easier to manufacture than a four-sided pyramid. We detail the design of the two components of the CACTI system, the adaptive optics simulator and the PWFS testbed that includes both a 3PWFS and 4PWFS. A preliminary experiment was performed on CACTI to study the performance of the 3PWFS to the 4PWFS in varying strengths of turbulence using both the Raw Intensity and Slopes Map signal processing methods. This experiment was repeated for a modulation radius of 1.6 lambda/D and 3.25 lambda/D. We found that the performance of the two wavefront sensors is comparable if modal loop gains are tuned.