The Power of Small Coalitions under Two-Tier Majority on Regular Graphs

TL;DR

This paper analyzes voting dynamics on regular graphs with loops, focusing on how small coalitions can influence the acceptance or rejection of proposals under a two-tier majority rule.

Contribution

It provides necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of graphs that accept or reject proposals based on coalition sizes and graph properties.

Findings

Characterizes conditions for proposal acceptance in regular graphs with loops.

Establishes criteria for graphs to reject proposals.

Connects voting dynamics to majority domination literature.

Abstract

In this paper, we study the following problem. Consider a setting where a proposal is offered to the vertices of a given network $G$, and the vertices must conduct a vote and decide whether to accept the proposal or reject it. Each vertex $v$ has its own valuation of the proposal; we say that $v$ is ``happy'' if its valuation is positive (i.e., it expects to gain from adopting the proposal) and ``sad'' if its valuation is negative. However, vertices do not base their vote merely on their own valuation. Rather, a vertex $v$ is a \emph{proponent} of the proposal if the majority of its neighbors are happy with it and an \emph{opponent} in the opposite case. At the end of the vote, the network collectively accepts the proposal whenever the majority of its vertices are proponents. We study this problem for regular graphs with loops. Specifically, we consider the class $\mathcal{G}_{n|d|h}$ of $d$-regular graphs of odd order $n$ with all $n$ loops and $h$ happy vertices. We are interested in establishing necessary and sufficient conditions for the class $\mathcal{G}_{n|d|h}$ to contain a labeled graph accepting the proposal, as well as conditions to contain a graph rejecting the proposal. We also discuss connections to the existing literature, including that on majority domination, and investigate the properties of the obtained conditions.