Steiner representations of hypersurfaces
Vincenzo Antonelli, Gianfranco Casnati

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between hypersurfaces in projective space and Steiner bundles, showing how defining forms can be expressed as determinants or pfaffians of morphisms between Steiner bundles, with concrete examples.
Contribution
It establishes a novel connection between hypersurface defining forms and Steiner bundles via morphisms, extending the understanding of algebraic hypersurfaces.
Findings
Defining forms of hypersurfaces can be expressed as determinants of morphisms between Steiner bundles.
For smooth surfaces in P^3, the defining form is a pfaffian of a skew-symmetric morphism.
Examples for low degree and dimension illustrate the theoretical results.
Abstract
Let be an integral hypersurface of degree . We show that each locally Cohen-Macaulay instanton sheaf on with respect to in the sense of Definition 1.3 in arXiv:2205.04767 [math.AG] yields the existence of Steiner bundles and on of the same rank and a morphism such that the form defining to the power is exactly . We inspect several examples for low values of , and . In particular, we show that the form defining a smooth integral surface in is the pfaffian of some skew-symmetric morphism , where is a suitable Steiner bundle on of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Commutative Algebra and Its Applications · Polynomial and algebraic computation
