Scaffolding Ethics-Focused Methods for Practice Resonance
Colin M. Gray, Shruthi Sai Chivukula, Thomas Carlock, Ziqing, Li, Ja-Nae Duane

TL;DR
This paper introduces empirically-supported intentions to help practitioners select ethics-focused methods, and develops heuristics to evaluate the resonance of resources, aiming to improve ethical practice in design.
Contribution
It presents a novel set of intentions and heuristics to enhance the discoverability and relevance of ethics-focused methods for practitioners.
Findings
Practitioners prefer resources framed in accessible language.
Intentions effectively guide method selection in practice.
Heuristics improve resource resonance and usability.
Abstract
Numerous methods and tools have been proposed to motivate or support ethical awareness in design practice. However, many existing resources are not easily discoverable by practitioners. One reason being that they are framed using language that is not immediately accessible or resonant with the felt complexity of everyday practice. In this paper, we propose a set of empirically-supported "intentions" to frame practitioners' selection of relevant ethics-focused methods based on interviews with practitioners from a range of technology and design professions, and then leverage these intentions in the design and iterative evaluation of a website that allows practitioners to identify supports for ethics-focused action in their work context. Building on these findings, we propose a set of heuristics to evaluate the practice resonance of resources to support ethics-focused practice, laying the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction · Information Systems Theories and Implementation · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
